Learn about the technologies behind the Internet with The TCP/IP Guide!|
NOTE: Using robot software to mass-download the site degrades the server and is prohibited. See here for more.
Find The PC Guide helpful? Please consider a donation to The PC Guide Tip Jar. Visa/MC/Paypal accepted.
|View over 750 of my fine art photos any time for free at DesktopScenes.com!|
Inappropriate Restocking Fees
In another section I described in detail my views on restocking fees. In particular, I supported my opinion that restocking fees are not the "pure evil" that some make them out to be. When fairly implemented by a reasonable vendor they serve a useful purpose: they keep down prices by discouraging frivolous returns.
Unfortunately, sometimes vendors aren't reasonable about charging restocking fees. There's an easy litmus test you can use to determine if a restocking fee is being charged inappropriately: if the return is due to a mistake you made in ordering that was your fault, then the restocking fee may be appropriate. If the return is due to anything that is not your fault, you should not be charged a restocking fee, regardless of "company policy". It's as simple as that. In theory, anyway. :^)
In the real world, inappropriate restocking fees have grown to epidemic proportions, particularly among smaller, less reputable online companies. These unscrupulous firms try to use the threat of a restocking fee to try to gain advantage over customers who have legitimate reasons for returns. In some cases they do not make any effort to notify the buyer at the time of the purchase that a restocking fee will apply to returns. Here are some specific situations in which you should never pay a restocking fee: