Mini-Me
01-28-2008, 07:29 PM
Hi.
With a brand-new 500GB drive, consisting of one 425GB partition, a 40GB partition, and a 2.4GB system partition, is there any serious danger in using quick-format?
Long-formatting the 2.4GB and 40GB partitions does not take that long, but long-formatting a 425GB partition would take hours, so I chose to simply tick the "Quick format" box when creating the new partition under Disk Management.
I suppose technically, there could be a bad area/sector even on a brand new drive, and the only way to be 100% sure the drive is fine, is to long-format it, however, I was of the opinion that a new drive is probably more likely to be perfectly fine, over an older drive which might have had a rough life and more likely to have bad sectors...
I have another 3 of these 500GB drives to setup yet, so long-formatting such huge partitions would take the rest of the week!!!
:D
What is the general consensus with quick-formatting vs long-formatting when you are talking 250+GB partitions?
Thanks.
With a brand-new 500GB drive, consisting of one 425GB partition, a 40GB partition, and a 2.4GB system partition, is there any serious danger in using quick-format?
Long-formatting the 2.4GB and 40GB partitions does not take that long, but long-formatting a 425GB partition would take hours, so I chose to simply tick the "Quick format" box when creating the new partition under Disk Management.
I suppose technically, there could be a bad area/sector even on a brand new drive, and the only way to be 100% sure the drive is fine, is to long-format it, however, I was of the opinion that a new drive is probably more likely to be perfectly fine, over an older drive which might have had a rough life and more likely to have bad sectors...
I have another 3 of these 500GB drives to setup yet, so long-formatting such huge partitions would take the rest of the week!!!
:D
What is the general consensus with quick-formatting vs long-formatting when you are talking 250+GB partitions?
Thanks.