PDA

View Full Version : My thoughts on Windows XP


steveo
08-17-2002, 03:22 AM
After convincing myself I wasn't going back to the computer biz a few months ago I get a phone call. These people just bought a business that has a IBM server and 4 IBM pc's attached to it via a network. As new owners they decided to scrap the existing win98 o/s and install fresh Windows XP. So they called me and asked if I could do it. I hummed and hawed not really wanting anything to do with it. This morning they call again. One hard drive is toast, another pc is frozen, one printer won't work. Invoices/payroll has to be done etc...we're in a panic, how soon can you be here? I've never even seen XP before so I have no idea how it works. I shouldn't be taking this job at all but being a idiot I take it because it's run and gun quick cash.

I arrive and get the lay of the land. The tape drives are out and a burner is in. The server is out and the best of the 4 pc's will act as the new server so I double the ram and install a new HDD/burner. Backups are done and all the boxes are wiped clean. I find out they bought the XP upgrade. This worries me to no end. I install their copy of win98se and then the XP upgrade. Where's all the drivers I ask? They look at me with blank stares. I need another pot of coffee. In goes XP and it begins to install. Why arn't these boxes crashing I wonder? I chew off a few nails. The server pc is installed. All drivers are automatically installed. I have to install some business programs so I know this will crash the server-pc. But it never does. I barely have to do anything outside of a few clicks here and there. I hit the next box and the next, same thing. Why is all this stuff working perfectly? Are the planets aligning? Is Stonehenge falling down? Have the aliens finally landed? Now all the boxes have XP including the software and nothing has crashed. I still have the laser HP printers to do. Surely this will crash the whole lot. XP just picks up the printers and test pages are flowing. Last is the network itself. For sure this isn't going to work...it just can't. I don't even know what kind of network is in place. Token ring? Star? Basic hub? I have no idea. I click away on the fly, pretending I'm using win98 but things are making sense. Xp isn't so hard afterall. The network is up and running and the boxes are talking to each other. I do little print jobs back and forth. I can see everything and everything can see me. I can even troubleshoot one box from another.

By 7pm I'm finished. The owners are happy, they wan't me as their pc tech plus if they get this upcoming contract I have a job in their shop over the winter. I brought home the toasted 10g hardrive which isn't toasted at all...they just panicked...it works fine. I have the server and tape drives as well. They want me to use it for a while to make sure it all works then I can sell it for them. It's been a weird day.

As far as I'm concerned Windows XP is a thing of beauty. Now, if I could only remember where I left my socks...

jabarnutcase
08-17-2002, 07:04 AM
Don't you love a story with a happy ending? ;)
I must say, XP is by far the best (M$) OS that I've used, so I'm not really suprised!
BTW steveo, you can do a clean install with an XP upgrade. (It would just prompt you for a previous version). And the CD is bootable.
Hope you find your socks! :D

ranchdog
08-17-2002, 11:20 AM
Easy Now.

Uncle Bill may read this and appoint
you the Head Man of his PR department!

However....

You do recieve a Gold Star and 1 Attaboy
for the accomplishment of the mission.

Heck. Now you have $$ to buy some new
socks. They come in pairs so they all
will have mates.

Won't have to mix 'n match any longer
'cause the clothes dryer keeps hiding
a sock somewhere.



:)


RD.

sea69
08-17-2002, 05:50 PM
and I couldn't agree more.

;)

Paul Komski
08-17-2002, 11:05 PM
so I double the ram
I just wonder how important that was. Seems one always needs much more than the minimum for every new OS MS brings out.

Anubis
08-17-2002, 11:25 PM
You ALWAYS need more then the minimum to run things. The bare minimum is just that, the absolute minimum. You CAN run whatever you like on a minimum system but in most cases more is better. Its not just MS either. Ever try playing games on the bare minimum? Chances are the graphics are never close to what they should be, load times are much longer and if your playing action games you may have slowups in processing.

jabarnutcase
08-17-2002, 11:49 PM
Seems like I've been doubling the ram ever since (Win3.11?)...Whatever M$ says is the minimum, I double it. At first, it was from 4 to 8MB. (I remember paying 180.00 for a 4 meg stick-It was on sale) :eek:... In the case of XP, the recommended minimum was 128.....so, I increased it six times to 768. :D Ha! Guess I got em that time.
HeHe- I swear they do that so more people will buy the os without worrying about their present amount of Ram.....The "bastages":p
When they say minimum, they're talking minimum! :D

sea69
08-17-2002, 11:59 PM
finally up to 512 here!

;)

jabarnutcase
08-18-2002, 12:07 AM
Yea, I got a little carried away- I actually went with 256 for a while...Then I saw a deal on a 512 stick I just couldn't pass up. (I hate it when that happens) :D
Nothing wrong with 512!! ;)

Paul Komski
08-18-2002, 12:16 AM
He he :D Hey you mathematicians out there; What's the minimum RAM needed to run an abacus? A few bytes I guess - but the CPU running it - now that's more complicated - how many "transistors" are there in the brain?! Only real problem is the bus - finger speed is I guess about 5Hz. ;)

jabarnutcase
08-18-2002, 12:23 AM
Not sure about the number of transistors. The problem I have is those darn capacitors- They keep charging and discharging in my brain and messing up my neo-transmitters...My finger speed has dropped well below 5hz :( makes my keysbored

Paul Komski
08-18-2002, 12:29 AM
The swapfile memory sure can get very volatile with age! :p

jabarnutcase
08-18-2002, 12:31 AM
Good point Paul....What was it we were talking about again? :confused:
Oh yea, memory

HeadachesAbound
08-18-2002, 04:50 AM
Plan to conduct an experiment to see if I can program in my sleep. Caught myself griping out my kids (2 and 3 yrs old) while I was sleeping earlier. Figured if I could form coherent thought while sleeping then why couldn't I program too. Just have to figure out how to get the information from RAM to STDOUT when the IDE channels are corrupted.

Only other alternative is to see if I can get my boss to run a direct LAN connection from cerebral cortex. Thus enabling direct access and increasing FSB to roughly 2GHz.

:cool:

steveo
08-27-2002, 11:40 PM
Since I did that little job something has happened that has never happened before...no call backs. Yeah you heard me, no call backs. I used to get call backs because something ended up not working but not this time. Customer's quite pleased. In fact I was so impressed I bought the operating system for myself.

sea69
08-28-2002, 12:13 AM
yep

;)