hawk7771us
10-19-2003, 03:29 PM
1:Content Cartel had a tax added to blank Cd's and hardware
2:They shut down napster
3: Went after the owners of P2P networks in court
4:Now they are after p2p individuals in the courts
5:They are suing the people who keep them in business
6:Getting a lot of people afraid of p2p with law suites from $750.00 to $150,000.00 dollars. With Huge lawyers fees if they do not settle with them.
7:Trying to get our elected officials to pass new laws that are tougher than the DMCA is now
8: Using DMCA as a end around fair use by copy protecting the movies and music Cd's, DVDs yes you may still copy them but it's still against the law of DMCA
9: Content Cartel (RIAA/MPAA)
When the Content Cartel first started out back in the early nineteen hundred's. Nobody and I mean nobody but this industry could make or show movies.The movie industry did what ever they could, to put every independent out of business. They had thugs destroying the films and the equipment of their competition. They had the police shut them down. Running them out of town or putting them in jail. They went to congress and the senate, with their lobbying groups and hammered out the new copyright laws. Now they are putting copy protected movies out and using the DMCA. The writing on the disk is so small you can't read it without magnification.Who carries a magnifying glass with them to the store. I can understand that the industry doesn't want anyone to copy their movies. With all the pirates out there.Selling the movies on street corners, back rooms or to have a company sell it in their store. You know the black market.Yes that must be stopped at all costs.
There is also what is known as Audio Home Recording Act The Audio Home Recording Act of 1992 Copyright Act of 1976, As Amended Chapter 10. Digital Audio Recording Devices. Which is fair use. To make a backup copy of the movie.Also how am I going to use my computer as a home theater.When it will not let me watch it with WIN DVD.You are breaking the law. But what I do not understand is after I put that DVD in my computer the other DVDs which I knew would work did not work after that. Since I can not do reverse engineering because of the DMCA. Not that I could do it myself anyway. I had to reformat my computer in order to watch the other movies that are not copy protected.Now it could be my computer but I think not or it could be window media player nine with that DRM. I do not know what cause it .But if it is your copy protection then it is a virus and should be outlawed.
The music industry is unscrupulous for they have no morals. From day one they took control of the sheet music,the player piano, radio, and then the artists. Because they owned the recording studios. Content cartel had them just about sign their lives away. Sure lots of the artists made good money back then. But most of them did not. The artists never made their money off of records.One example Bunny Berigan sometimes made a thousand a week in NYC in 1938.Working his butt off,going from one gig to another gig. But other times he had to sell his music to live on. One of which, was his number one song. For one hundred dollars to RCA. Artists went from town to town, just like it is today. It has not changed since then. Nor will it change now. The music industry will die fighting for this concept and business model. Antitrust $143 million settlement by the DOJ. But still made Millions of dollars beyond the fine. If you do the math it comes out to about $1.35 per Cd. Yet they admitted no wrong doings. Doing something wrong and they still make money from it. It is OK for Content Cartel to do it but no one else can. Even if it noncommercial p2p. Yet with their Amnesty program you have to admitted your wrong doings. With detail information even a picture id. One sided wouldn't you say of this Monopolistic Content Cartel.
What happen to this part of the copyright law? Sub chapter D. Prohibition on certain infringement action, remedies, and arbitration Section 1008. Prohibition on certain infringement actions No action may be brought under this title alleging infringement of copyright based on the manufacture, importation, or distribution of a digital audio recording device, a digital audio recording medium, an analog recording device, or an analog recording medium, or based on the noncommercial use by a consumer of such a device or medium for making digital musical recordings or analog musical recordings. Is this not what the Dart fund was for, that the music and movie industries Agreed to. So they would be compensated for music and movies copied, on blank Cd's and DVDs. "Still, one is left with the fact that the law NEVER uses the word tax. It specifically uses the word "royalty", which has a well understood meaning in the context of copyright law. A royalty is compensation paid to a copyright holder, in exchange for permission to exercise what would otherwise be an exclusive right of the copyright holder. There is no reason to believe that the AHRA royalties are anything other then what they appear to be -- statutory royalties paid by individuals to copyright holders." http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/archive/dvd-discuss/msg12685.html
This part of the copyright law sounds like a computer and the INTERNET to me. Since they already have been paid by the tax. From the hardware and blank Cd's and i think blank DVDs. The downloading of mp3 and copied on to Cd's the copyright is already paid for though this tax. As long as it noncommercial use by the consumer. P2P is noncommercial use, not one person is paid a penny for mp3. It is the same as tapping a song off of the radio. The only difference is there is more to listen to, and it is in a digital medium. For the Content Cartel has no control over it as they do over the radio. But they were paid for this through this tax. It is not my fault that The Content Cartel only gets paid X amount for which they agreed to. The Content Cartel says, Blank Cd's, DVDs have sold more than non blank Cd's. Well you get the tax for it.The more we buy,the more royalty you get for copyright. No matter if it's used for different data other than music they still get the royalty. I know most of us backup just about everything we can. If you don't then it bye, bye data.
2:They shut down napster
3: Went after the owners of P2P networks in court
4:Now they are after p2p individuals in the courts
5:They are suing the people who keep them in business
6:Getting a lot of people afraid of p2p with law suites from $750.00 to $150,000.00 dollars. With Huge lawyers fees if they do not settle with them.
7:Trying to get our elected officials to pass new laws that are tougher than the DMCA is now
8: Using DMCA as a end around fair use by copy protecting the movies and music Cd's, DVDs yes you may still copy them but it's still against the law of DMCA
9: Content Cartel (RIAA/MPAA)
When the Content Cartel first started out back in the early nineteen hundred's. Nobody and I mean nobody but this industry could make or show movies.The movie industry did what ever they could, to put every independent out of business. They had thugs destroying the films and the equipment of their competition. They had the police shut them down. Running them out of town or putting them in jail. They went to congress and the senate, with their lobbying groups and hammered out the new copyright laws. Now they are putting copy protected movies out and using the DMCA. The writing on the disk is so small you can't read it without magnification.Who carries a magnifying glass with them to the store. I can understand that the industry doesn't want anyone to copy their movies. With all the pirates out there.Selling the movies on street corners, back rooms or to have a company sell it in their store. You know the black market.Yes that must be stopped at all costs.
There is also what is known as Audio Home Recording Act The Audio Home Recording Act of 1992 Copyright Act of 1976, As Amended Chapter 10. Digital Audio Recording Devices. Which is fair use. To make a backup copy of the movie.Also how am I going to use my computer as a home theater.When it will not let me watch it with WIN DVD.You are breaking the law. But what I do not understand is after I put that DVD in my computer the other DVDs which I knew would work did not work after that. Since I can not do reverse engineering because of the DMCA. Not that I could do it myself anyway. I had to reformat my computer in order to watch the other movies that are not copy protected.Now it could be my computer but I think not or it could be window media player nine with that DRM. I do not know what cause it .But if it is your copy protection then it is a virus and should be outlawed.
The music industry is unscrupulous for they have no morals. From day one they took control of the sheet music,the player piano, radio, and then the artists. Because they owned the recording studios. Content cartel had them just about sign their lives away. Sure lots of the artists made good money back then. But most of them did not. The artists never made their money off of records.One example Bunny Berigan sometimes made a thousand a week in NYC in 1938.Working his butt off,going from one gig to another gig. But other times he had to sell his music to live on. One of which, was his number one song. For one hundred dollars to RCA. Artists went from town to town, just like it is today. It has not changed since then. Nor will it change now. The music industry will die fighting for this concept and business model. Antitrust $143 million settlement by the DOJ. But still made Millions of dollars beyond the fine. If you do the math it comes out to about $1.35 per Cd. Yet they admitted no wrong doings. Doing something wrong and they still make money from it. It is OK for Content Cartel to do it but no one else can. Even if it noncommercial p2p. Yet with their Amnesty program you have to admitted your wrong doings. With detail information even a picture id. One sided wouldn't you say of this Monopolistic Content Cartel.
What happen to this part of the copyright law? Sub chapter D. Prohibition on certain infringement action, remedies, and arbitration Section 1008. Prohibition on certain infringement actions No action may be brought under this title alleging infringement of copyright based on the manufacture, importation, or distribution of a digital audio recording device, a digital audio recording medium, an analog recording device, or an analog recording medium, or based on the noncommercial use by a consumer of such a device or medium for making digital musical recordings or analog musical recordings. Is this not what the Dart fund was for, that the music and movie industries Agreed to. So they would be compensated for music and movies copied, on blank Cd's and DVDs. "Still, one is left with the fact that the law NEVER uses the word tax. It specifically uses the word "royalty", which has a well understood meaning in the context of copyright law. A royalty is compensation paid to a copyright holder, in exchange for permission to exercise what would otherwise be an exclusive right of the copyright holder. There is no reason to believe that the AHRA royalties are anything other then what they appear to be -- statutory royalties paid by individuals to copyright holders." http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/archive/dvd-discuss/msg12685.html
This part of the copyright law sounds like a computer and the INTERNET to me. Since they already have been paid by the tax. From the hardware and blank Cd's and i think blank DVDs. The downloading of mp3 and copied on to Cd's the copyright is already paid for though this tax. As long as it noncommercial use by the consumer. P2P is noncommercial use, not one person is paid a penny for mp3. It is the same as tapping a song off of the radio. The only difference is there is more to listen to, and it is in a digital medium. For the Content Cartel has no control over it as they do over the radio. But they were paid for this through this tax. It is not my fault that The Content Cartel only gets paid X amount for which they agreed to. The Content Cartel says, Blank Cd's, DVDs have sold more than non blank Cd's. Well you get the tax for it.The more we buy,the more royalty you get for copyright. No matter if it's used for different data other than music they still get the royalty. I know most of us backup just about everything we can. If you don't then it bye, bye data.