kenshin
10-21-2000, 05:12 PM
Alrighty, recently my friend and I got in a discussion about processor speed and memory speed and since I have no clue about any of that stuff (i'm a software kinda guy), I decided to find out if what he's saying is real, or just stuff he pulled out from you know where.
He says that processors are merely multipliers and don't really have speeds. When I mentioned memory he said pc100, pc133, pc150, etc and said that your actual memory type is what your processor speed will be. He then used math such as: pc100 * 8 = 800 mhz. I thought that processor "speed?" was not dependent on memory speed. I thought it was stand alone. I had heard of different types of memory and the faster ones were better, but he merely said if I had a 133mhz memory, that my actual processor was then only 600 since pc100s were standard? Okay, I really don't make sense, but you get the general nature of my question, could you tell please tell me the real deal? I tend to be wary about his rants since he often times is full of it.
Kenshin
He says that processors are merely multipliers and don't really have speeds. When I mentioned memory he said pc100, pc133, pc150, etc and said that your actual memory type is what your processor speed will be. He then used math such as: pc100 * 8 = 800 mhz. I thought that processor "speed?" was not dependent on memory speed. I thought it was stand alone. I had heard of different types of memory and the faster ones were better, but he merely said if I had a 133mhz memory, that my actual processor was then only 600 since pc100s were standard? Okay, I really don't make sense, but you get the general nature of my question, could you tell please tell me the real deal? I tend to be wary about his rants since he often times is full of it.
Kenshin