Brett
02-07-2001, 09:51 PM
About 1 1/2 years ago I purchased an AMD KII 400, 65Mram and an 16Meg (AGP x 1) Nvidia TNT card thinking that graphics would zoom. Its first real test was UNREAL. My setup failed miserably. Its only smooth (and grainy) and playable at 320x400 with all the sound and graphice features turned off or down. I also download game demos to test my system (I'm going in) with the same result - almost unplayable. I recently borrowed 64mram, plugged it in, computer saw it OK but without any appreciable improvement. What will really improve my graphics? Will the TNT2 generation fix it or do I need 32Mram as opposed to 16Mram graphics accelerator because more ram does zip.
Could the game improve if I copy the CD on my HD?
Could my CDx16 be too slow feeding my accelerator?
Could an ATA33 HD be too slow feeding the graphic accelerator?
Or is my CD and HD OK and the problem lies with the speed and capacity of the accelerator?
Does the size of L1 and L2 cache have any performance bearing? Obviously the CPU speed is improved but does the AGP bus bypass any advantages there?
What about FSB speed. I notice that AMD have 200 FSB. With the same setup as above but changing the M/B to AMD 400 FSB 200 would I see an improvement?
Would a motherboard with AGP x 2 or x 4 be any quicker?
A lot of questions here but my understanding is fractured. At least I know that if I had an 800CPU it would work twice as fast but does it really come down to the speed and capacity of a graphics accelerator?
Could the game improve if I copy the CD on my HD?
Could my CDx16 be too slow feeding my accelerator?
Could an ATA33 HD be too slow feeding the graphic accelerator?
Or is my CD and HD OK and the problem lies with the speed and capacity of the accelerator?
Does the size of L1 and L2 cache have any performance bearing? Obviously the CPU speed is improved but does the AGP bus bypass any advantages there?
What about FSB speed. I notice that AMD have 200 FSB. With the same setup as above but changing the M/B to AMD 400 FSB 200 would I see an improvement?
Would a motherboard with AGP x 2 or x 4 be any quicker?
A lot of questions here but my understanding is fractured. At least I know that if I had an 800CPU it would work twice as fast but does it really come down to the speed and capacity of a graphics accelerator?