Intel Core Ultra 9 285 (non-K) is almost on par with the 14900K in new Geekbench results
Table of Contents
We’ve seen the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K outperform its predecessors and the competition time and time again. While it may have the spotlight right now (outside of AMD’s 9800X3D), it seems its lesser-powered variant, the Core Ultra 8 285, isn’t messing around either.
The Arrow Lake flagship and locked variant have 24 cores, each with 24 threads. On paper, this puts them at a disadvantage against processors like the 14900K and the Ryzen 9 9950X, which have more cores and 32 threads each. Regardless of the watered-down specs, let’s see how it fared against the 14900K.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 Geekbench performance
Geekbench results for the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 are live. They are impressive, given that it has a slower base clock of 2.5GHz, compared to 285K’s base frequency of 3.2 and 3.7 GHz, for E- and P-cores, respectively. Also, the 285K has a base power of 125W, while the locked variant of this processor has a 65W TDP, meaning the cores have less power to work with.
Despite this handicap, the Core Ultra 9 285 performed almost at the same level as the i9-14900K. It had a single- and multi-core score of 3,247 and 20,204, respectively. On the other hand, the latest Geekbench results for the 14900K gave it scores of 3,130 and 21,426.
So, the 285 has better single-core performance, but the 14900K takes the lead with a better multi-core score, but the difference in score is only 1,222 points. That said, the 285 was tested with 32GB DDR5 RAM running at 5,600 MT/s, while the 14900K had significantly more memory to work with as it had 48GB DDR5 RAM running at 7,400 MT/s.
Deals season is here folks, and Amazon has already kickstarted its early Black Friday deals! We'll be covering all the best deals in more details over in our deals hub, but if you haven't got time to read through those, why not see our top picks below.
- ASUS TUF NVIDIA RTX 5080 Was $1599 Now $1199
- ASUS TUF RTX 5070 Ti Was $999 Now $849
- Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 Was $899 Now $649
- TCL 43S250R Roku TV 2023 Was $279 Now $199
- iBUYPOWER Y40 Gaming PC Was $2,299 Now $1,819
- Samsung Odyssey G9 (G95C) Was $1,299 Now $777
- Alienware Area-51 gaming laptop Was $3,499 Now $2,799
- Samsung 77-inch OLED S95F Was $4,297 Now $3,497
- ASUS ROG Strix G16 Was $1,499 Now $1,199
*Prices and savings subject to change. Click through to get the current prices.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 Geekbench result
Intel Core i9-14900K Geekbench result with 32GB RAM
Intel Core i9-14900K Geekbench result with 48GB RAM
If we were to even the playing field and give the 14900K the same memory to work with, how would it impact the outcome? Luckily, we have a Geekbench test result for the 14900K with 32GB RAM at 5,600 MT/s. This result shows that it has a better single-core score than the 14900K with 48GB RAM with 3,142 points, while the multi-core performance took a hit and dropped to 19,760.
However, its single-core score isn’t able to match that of the 285, and with less memory available, it isn’t surprising the multi-core score declined. Remember that these results don’t necessarily translate to how a CPU will perform across the board because, as we’ve seen, just changing one aspect of the test bench can change the outcome for better or worse.
The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has great performance across the board but, comparatively, lacks in gaming. Whether the Core Ultra 9 285 will also suffer from that, we’ll have to wait and see when the Arrow Lake processors drop on October 24th.
About the Author