Another iPhone 17 battery test shows Pro Max ahead of Samsung, even the model with a smaller battery
Table of Contents
Apple has been quick to boast about the battery life of its latest iPhone 17 models. On top of that, they seem particularly proud of the iPhone Air’s longevity while being the brand’s slimmest iPhone to date. Yes, it does come bottom of the list in the test we’re talking about today, but it’s no slouch; the slimline device has also proven to be mighty durable.
The new flagship iPhone 17 Pro Max has proven to be safely ahead of its competition as far as battery life goes. Early review tests revealed it leap ahead of the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, lasting over 3 hours longer, though the exact testing conditions were not clear. Now, we have reliable test results to take a look at, and these are for the physical SIM versions.
iPhone 17 series battery life vs Galaxy S25 Ultra and iPhone 16
For those that don’t know, iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max battery capacity differs between eSIM-only and physical SIM models (which one you’ll get depends on your region). The battery is the same in both variants of the standard iPhone 17, and the iPhone Air is eSIM-only in all regions as a result of its slim form factor. To put it simply, the lack of a physical SIM card slot allowed Apple to fit a bigger battery in the Pro series. Here’s how they differ:
Latest tech deals.
- AMD Ryzenโข 9 9900X 12-Core - was $499 now $331
- Sony INZONE M10S 27โ - was $899 now $748
- Thermaltake LCGS View i1470S-170 - was $2,399 now $2,099
- Apple 2026 MacBook Air - was $1,999 now $1,891
- Bose QuietComfort Headphones - was $359 now $169
- LG 77-inch OLED C6 - was $2,499 now $1,999
- MSI Prestige 16 Flip - was $2,149 now $1,870
-
Hisense 85" U6 Pro Series-
Prices correct as of November 5th, 2026.
- iPhone Pro Max: 5,098 mAh (eSIM) / 4,823 mAh (physical SIM)
- iPhone Pro: 4,252 mAh (eSIM) / 3,988 mAh (physical SIM)
With that important detail out of the way, we can hand it over to popular tech YouTuber Mrwhosetheboss as a reliable source for these battery life tests. Hailing from the UK, the YouTuber has tested the physical SIM variants of the new phones, so the scores actually represent the worst you’ll get from the Pro and Pro Max – the eSIM-only models you’ll find in the United States would perform even better.
| Phone (all physical SIM models) | Battery life |
|---|---|
| iPhone 17 Pro Max | 13 hours |
| iPhone 16 Pro Max | 12 hours and 15 minutes |
| Galaxy S25 Ultra | 11 hours and 58 minutes |
| iPhone 17 Pro | 10 hours and 48 minutes |
| iPhone 17 | 10 hours and 28 minutes |
| iPhone 16 | 9 hours and 51 minutes |
| iPhone Air | 7 hours and 18 minutes |
In the UK/EU, you can actually opt for eSIM, though a physical SIM card slot remains on the device, which means the reduced battery size regardless. This does allow for dual SIM support however, with either a physical SIM and an eSIM, or two eSIMs.
Apple customers in the U.S. have been used to eSIM-only models for a while now – this has been the case since the iPhone 14. With this generation, however, Apple has expanded the list of regions that are eSIM-only. The list now includes Canada, Japan, much of the Middle East, and more.