Learn about the technologies behind the Internet with The TCP/IP Guide!|
NOTE: Using robot software to mass-download the site degrades the server and is prohibited. See here for more.
Find The PC Guide helpful? Please consider a donation to The PC Guide Tip Jar. Visa/MC/Paypal accepted.
|View over 750 of my fine art photos any time for free at DesktopScenes.com!|
Putting Performance Measurement In Perspective
"There are three types of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics."
I seem to have a habit of taking somewhat controversial stands that fly in the face of what most other hardware writers say on various subjects. This page will certainly be no exception. :^) Here it is, blurted out in simple terms: hard disk performance is important, but hard disk performance measurement is often overrated and over-emphasized. The Internet is filled with discussions about various benchmarks; arguments over which benchmarks are better and worse; people getting upset when their hardware gets benchmarks scores that are "too low"; review sites recommending one hard disk over another on the basis of it scoring a few percentage points over another in a synthetic test; and so on. In my opinion, most of this has little relevance to the way most people use their PCs, and the people who are so concerned about "which hard disk to get" when they are looking at comparable models are worrying too much.
Sure, it's useful to see benchmark scores on hardware before you plan a purchase. But you should keep them in perspective. An important rule of thumb in the PC industry is that in real-world computer use, most PC users don't notice an increase (or decrease) in performance of less than about 10%. That means that even if you could prove without a shadow of a doubt that hard disk "A" was 7% faster than hard disk "B", you probably wouldn't really notice any difference in your system. And in most cases, competitive products put out at about the same time by high-end manufacturers often don't differ in performance by more than 10%. The biggest mistake people make is to over-value the numbers they read about various hardware benchmarks. Use them as a rough guideline only. A month down the road you probably won't even remember what "your benchmark scores" were, and they certainly won't matter much to you. I've been down this road, believe me.
Also remember that there are other attributes besides performance that are important for selecting hardware. Lots of people try to get the very fastest hard disk but don't consider other equally important issues: quality, reliability, warranty, and data backup. People agonize over which hard disk is a teeny bit faster than another--and then never defragment their file system, or fill the hard disk up with junk so it runs less efficiently. Be sure to keep the big picture view.
Finally, bear in mind that whatever is on the top of the hill in the hard disk world doesn't stay there for long. Sure, it's a good feeling to think you are getting the fastest disk around. But every few months, a new model comes out that is faster than anything that preceded it. If you really want to always have the best hard disk, you have to keep buying more hardware, which is an expensive proposition that few opt for. See here for more on this subject.