Custom Search
Join the PC homebuilding revolution! Read the all-new, FREE 200-page online guide: How to Build Your Own PC!
NOTE: Using robot software to mass-download the site degrades the server and is prohibited. See here for more.
Find The PC Guide helpful? Please consider a donation to The PC Guide Tip Jar. Visa/MC/Paypal accepted.
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: A7V600 or A7N8X

  1. #1

    A7V600 or A7N8X

    Want to know which one to get. Will be bundled with AMD Barton 2500 and 512 Kingston PC-2700. Im not really into oc'ing but might experiment with it later. The reason im thinking of getting A7V600 is because it has serial ATA.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    12,242
    Blog Entries
    2
    If it has SATA, then by all means get it! I think only the expensive Deluxe versions of the A7N8X have SATA. Both Asus mobo's should have plenty of OC'ing features if you want to mess with that.

    As for the chipsets, it's true that the A7N8X uses the NForce2 chipset and therefore has dual-channel RAM, but I find most of that goes to waste on the AMD platform. The CPU itself just doesn't have the bandwidth of the P4 and therefore only gets a small boost from dual-channel. Benchmarks show 3-10% on average, with 10% being very hard to hit and only in certain games.

    IMO, if you want better game performance, you're better off getting an expensive graphics card! CPU power, RAM, and graphics cards are the only sure-fire way to improve gaming performance. Playing "chipset roulette" only gets you so far.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    HI
    Posts
    859
    If given the above 2 choices, I would go with the A7N8X. The reason is because of the stability of the Nforce2 chipset. Via KT chipset just can't compete with it. As for SATA, it won't be too much of an increase over PATA until SATA II. Although I agree with Sap that a powerful vid card will improve gaming more than any chipset.
    Currently Running:
    AMD 3200+ Venice @ 2.3 GHz(230x10) 1.38V
    DFI NF4 SLi-D
    2x1024MB Corsair Infineon BE-5 @ 230MHz(2.5-3-3-6-1T)
    KDS 19" Flat-screen CRT
    Logitech Z-640 5.1
    Seagate 120GB + WD 80GB
    Sony DVD Burner
    Enermax 600W NoisetakerII
    BFG 7900GT @530/1600

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    12,242
    Blog Entries
    2
    Both very valid points, Deagle, and I would personally agree with you. I like the NForce2 chipset very much, and SATA isn't a total draw. However, SATA 1.0 is still attractive and for those who don't want to upgrade their mobo every 9 months, banking on a little future-proofing isn't a bad idea. Besides, we don't know which version of the A7N8X is getting bundled in. If it's the original version, it won't support the 200MHz FSB and isn't all that stable anyway.

    I guess you really have to decide if you want SATA, or if the NForce2 chipset is more attractive to you. If you go with the A7N8X, check the version number. 2.0 is the latest I believe, and is equipped with the NForce2 Ultra 400 chipset version.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •